| |
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha : |
10/12/2020 |
|
Actualizado : |
10/12/2020 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Autor : |
DUMONT, B.; MODERNEL, P.; BENOIT, M.; RUGGIA, A.; SOCA, P.; DERNAT, S.; TOURNADRE, H.; DOGLIOTTI, S.; ROSSING, W. |
|
Afiliación : |
BERTRAND DUMONT, Université Clermont Auvergne, INRAE, VetAgro Sup, UMR Herbivores, Saint-Genès Champanelle, France; PABLO MODERNEL, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, Netherlands; Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay; MARC BENOIT, Université Clermont Auvergne, INRAE, VetAgro Sup, UMR Herbivores, Saint-Genès Champanelle, France; ANDREA PAOLA RUGGIA CHIESA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; PABLO SOCA, Université Clermont Auvergne, Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement, AgroParisTech, VetAgro Sup, UMR Territoires, Aubière, France; SYLVAIN DERNAT, Université Clermont Auvergne, Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement, AgroParisTech, VetAgro Sup, UMR Territoires, Aubière, France; HERVÉ TOURNADRE, Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement, UE Herbipôle, Saint-Genès-Champanelle, France; SANTIAGO DOGLIOTTI, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay; WALTER A.H. ROSSING, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, Netherlands. |
|
Título : |
Mobilizing ecological processes for herbivore production: farmers and researchers learning together. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2020 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 16 November 2020, Volume 4, Article number 544828. OPEN ACCESS. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.544828 |
|
ISSN : |
2571-581X |
|
DOI : |
10.3389/fsufs.2020.544828 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received: 22 March 2020; Accepted: 24 September 2020; Published: 16 November 2020.
Edited by: Iain James Gordon, Australian National University, Australia. Reviewed by: Jane Addison, James Cook University, Australia;
Luis F. Goulao, University of Lisbon, Portugal; Carlos Gonzalez Fischer, New Zealand Agricultural Greenhouse Gas Research Centre, New Zealand.
Corresponding author: Bertrand Dumont, bertrand.dumont@inrae.fr |
|
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.
Grazing plays a key role in reducing the external inputs required for ruminant production and in alleviating feed-food competition. Beyond the production of meat and milk, grassland-based systems provide a wide range of ecosystem services. Agroecology and organic farming aim to reconcile natural resource management and food production, in the long term, based on the management of ecological processes. In this perspective paper, we report what we have learned from case studies with beef cattle, sheep, and dairy cattle across Uruguay and western Europe, in which we have been involved. Multicriteria methods, such as Pareto frontiers and positive deviances, were used to analyze trade-offs and identify win?wins from farm surveys. Long-term farm networks coupled with bioeconomic optimization models revealed fluctuations in farm income and allowed estimating system resilience. Extensive farmlet experiments made it possible to integrate knowledge on animal physiology and grassland ecology in the system redesign process and to test for innovative and risky management options that could lead to unacceptable learning costs in commercial farms. Finally, learning from farmers' local knowledge in teams with researchers and technical advisers can provide positive changes in grazing systems. In Uruguayan family farms, for example, the scientific knowledge gained from farmlet experiments led to advice on management options based on farm-specific diagnosis. Farmers adapted the proposals, with researchers supporting the processes by providing quantitative information on consequences and spaces for reflection. In a French cheese production area, the focus was on farmers' own experience. Games facilitated interactions as participants could challenge each other's reasoning and conclusions in a safe environment. These two case studies illustrate the diversity of co-innovation approaches, but in both cases knowledge sharing between researchers, farmers, and other stakeholders appeared more efficient to help farmers understand and adapt their own system properties than researching ?best practice? solutions for large-scale transfer.
© Copyright © 2020 Dumont, Modernel, Benoit, Ruggia, Soca, Dernat, Tournadre, Dogliotti and Rossing. MenosABSTRACT.
Grazing plays a key role in reducing the external inputs required for ruminant production and in alleviating feed-food competition. Beyond the production of meat and milk, grassland-based systems provide a wide range of ecosystem services. Agroecology and organic farming aim to reconcile natural resource management and food production, in the long term, based on the management of ecological processes. In this perspective paper, we report what we have learned from case studies with beef cattle, sheep, and dairy cattle across Uruguay and western Europe, in which we have been involved. Multicriteria methods, such as Pareto frontiers and positive deviances, were used to analyze trade-offs and identify win?wins from farm surveys. Long-term farm networks coupled with bioeconomic optimization models revealed fluctuations in farm income and allowed estimating system resilience. Extensive farmlet experiments made it possible to integrate knowledge on animal physiology and grassland ecology in the system redesign process and to test for innovative and risky management options that could lead to unacceptable learning costs in commercial farms. Finally, learning from farmers' local knowledge in teams with researchers and technical advisers can provide positive changes in grazing systems. In Uruguayan family farms, for example, the scientific knowledge gained from farmlet experiments led to advice on management options based on farm-specific diagnosis. Farmers adapted the propo... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
AGROECOLOGY; CO-INNOVATION; GRAZING; MANAGEMENT; TRADE-OFFS. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
A50 Investigación agraria |
|
URL : |
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsufs.2020.544828/full
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsufs.2020.544828/pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 03640naa a2200313 a 4500
001 1061558
005 2020-12-10
008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a2571-581X
024 7 $a10.3389/fsufs.2020.544828$2DOI
100 1 $aDUMONT, B.
245 $aMobilizing ecological processes for herbivore production$bfarmers and researchers learning together.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2020
500 $aArticle history: Received: 22 March 2020; Accepted: 24 September 2020; Published: 16 November 2020. Edited by: Iain James Gordon, Australian National University, Australia. Reviewed by: Jane Addison, James Cook University, Australia; Luis F. Goulao, University of Lisbon, Portugal; Carlos Gonzalez Fischer, New Zealand Agricultural Greenhouse Gas Research Centre, New Zealand. Corresponding author: Bertrand Dumont, bertrand.dumont@inrae.fr
520 $aABSTRACT. Grazing plays a key role in reducing the external inputs required for ruminant production and in alleviating feed-food competition. Beyond the production of meat and milk, grassland-based systems provide a wide range of ecosystem services. Agroecology and organic farming aim to reconcile natural resource management and food production, in the long term, based on the management of ecological processes. In this perspective paper, we report what we have learned from case studies with beef cattle, sheep, and dairy cattle across Uruguay and western Europe, in which we have been involved. Multicriteria methods, such as Pareto frontiers and positive deviances, were used to analyze trade-offs and identify win?wins from farm surveys. Long-term farm networks coupled with bioeconomic optimization models revealed fluctuations in farm income and allowed estimating system resilience. Extensive farmlet experiments made it possible to integrate knowledge on animal physiology and grassland ecology in the system redesign process and to test for innovative and risky management options that could lead to unacceptable learning costs in commercial farms. Finally, learning from farmers' local knowledge in teams with researchers and technical advisers can provide positive changes in grazing systems. In Uruguayan family farms, for example, the scientific knowledge gained from farmlet experiments led to advice on management options based on farm-specific diagnosis. Farmers adapted the proposals, with researchers supporting the processes by providing quantitative information on consequences and spaces for reflection. In a French cheese production area, the focus was on farmers' own experience. Games facilitated interactions as participants could challenge each other's reasoning and conclusions in a safe environment. These two case studies illustrate the diversity of co-innovation approaches, but in both cases knowledge sharing between researchers, farmers, and other stakeholders appeared more efficient to help farmers understand and adapt their own system properties than researching ?best practice? solutions for large-scale transfer. © Copyright © 2020 Dumont, Modernel, Benoit, Ruggia, Soca, Dernat, Tournadre, Dogliotti and Rossing.
653 $aAGROECOLOGY
653 $aCO-INNOVATION
653 $aGRAZING
653 $aMANAGEMENT
653 $aTRADE-OFFS
700 1 $aMODERNEL, P.
700 1 $aBENOIT, M.
700 1 $aRUGGIA, A.
700 1 $aSOCA, P.
700 1 $aDERNAT, S.
700 1 $aTOURNADRE, H.
700 1 $aDOGLIOTTI, S.
700 1 $aROSSING, W.
773 $tFrontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 16 November 2020, Volume 4, Article number 544828. OPEN ACCESS. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.544828
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Las Brujas. Por información adicional contacte bibliolb@inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha actual : |
21/10/2014 |
|
Actualizado : |
25/09/2019 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
B - 3 |
|
Autor : |
MULVANEY, F.J.; MORRIS, S.T.; KENYON, P.R.; MOREL, P.C.H.; WEST, D.M.; VIÑOLES, C.; GLOVER, K.M.M. |
|
Afiliación : |
CAROLINA VIÑOLES GIL, Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Comparison between the reproductive performance of ewe hoggets and mature ewes following a progesterone-based oestrus synchronization protocol. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2013 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, 2013, v.56, no.4, p. 288-296. |
|
Serie : |
0028-8233 |
|
DOI : |
10.1080/00288233.2013.842176 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received 27 May 2013 // Accepted 5 September 2013. |
|
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.
Two experiments were conducted to compare the reproductive performance of ewe hoggets and mature ewes. All ewes were synchronized by an intravaginal progesterone-releasing device and bred together over a 5-day period. In Experiment 1, of those joined with the ram, more mature ewes ovulated (99% vs 68%; P < 0.05) with a higher ovulation rate (1.82 vs 1.14; P < 0.05) than ewe hoggets. Mature ewes had a higher pregnancy rate (98% vs 47%; P < 0.05) and lower early pregnancy loss (13% vs 41%; P < 0.05) than ewe hoggets. In Experiment 2, the ovulation rate (1.84 vs 1.44; P < 0.05) and pregnancy rate (86% vs 7%; P < 0.05) was higher in mature ewes compared with ewe hoggets. Combined, these studies help to quantify the difference in reproductive performance during breeding and pregnancy between ewe hoggets and mature ewes, and help to direct further research.
© 2013 The Royal Society of New Zealand. |
|
Thesagro : |
CORDEROS; REPRODUCCION ANIMAL. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
L53 Fisiología Animal - Reproducción |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 01779naa a2200253 a 4500
001 1051218
005 2019-09-25
008 2013 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1080/00288233.2013.842176$2DOI
100 1 $aMULVANEY, F.J.
245 $aComparison between the reproductive performance of ewe hoggets and mature ewes following a progesterone-based oestrus synchronization protocol.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2013
490 $a0028-8233
500 $aArticle history: Received 27 May 2013 // Accepted 5 September 2013.
520 $aABSTRACT. Two experiments were conducted to compare the reproductive performance of ewe hoggets and mature ewes. All ewes were synchronized by an intravaginal progesterone-releasing device and bred together over a 5-day period. In Experiment 1, of those joined with the ram, more mature ewes ovulated (99% vs 68%; P < 0.05) with a higher ovulation rate (1.82 vs 1.14; P < 0.05) than ewe hoggets. Mature ewes had a higher pregnancy rate (98% vs 47%; P < 0.05) and lower early pregnancy loss (13% vs 41%; P < 0.05) than ewe hoggets. In Experiment 2, the ovulation rate (1.84 vs 1.44; P < 0.05) and pregnancy rate (86% vs 7%; P < 0.05) was higher in mature ewes compared with ewe hoggets. Combined, these studies help to quantify the difference in reproductive performance during breeding and pregnancy between ewe hoggets and mature ewes, and help to direct further research. © 2013 The Royal Society of New Zealand.
650 $aCORDEROS
650 $aREPRODUCCION ANIMAL
700 1 $aMORRIS, S.T.
700 1 $aKENYON, P.R.
700 1 $aMOREL, P.C.H.
700 1 $aWEST, D.M.
700 1 $aVIÑOLES, C.
700 1 $aGLOVER, K.M.M.
773 $tNew Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, 2013$gv.56, no.4, p. 288-296.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
